Many of us have seen the lies on Wikipedia regarding MMS. Well, now we have further evidence of Wikipedia lies.
Here's my local news report on the article:
5/28/14 12:47 PM
If you have a question about your health, do you use Wikipedia?
The crowd-sourcing online encyclopedia is a popular tool for some students and others to find a quick answer, but it may be a destination to avoid for health information.
A study published in The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association tested the reliability of the crowd-sourced entries on Wikipedia.
Researchers looked at the 10 most costly medical conditions in the country – like lung cancer, back pain, and osteoarthritis.
They found the Wikipedia entries contradict medical research for peer-reviewed journals about 90 percent of the time – information on nine out of 10 entries had errors.
But it’s not just people at home using it – the study found that 47 to 70 percent of physicians and medical students use it as a reference.
The researchers conclude that caution should be exercised when using websites such as Wikipedia for any medical questuh on traject
Nigel Watson freethinker skype orbizen2 727.493.1990
Blog ORBizen Memo
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society”-Krishnamurti
"Life has but 2 things to offer us: time and each other." -NjW
Disclaimer:The protocols described on this site are official sacraments of the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing. The reader accepts 100% responsibility for any and all use made of any information herein.